Law Seminars International Presents: A One-Hour Expert Analysis by Phone on the

DC Circuit Overturns FTC's Rambus Decision
Dial-in from anywhere and have the opportunity to ask questions

May 8, 2008
TeleBriefing at 11:00 am Pacific, 12:00 pm Mountain, 1:00 pm Central, & 2:00 pm Eastern

Who Should Dial In

In-house counsel, IP, antitrust and technology lawyers, technology executives and engineers and any participant in standard setting organizations or patent pools

Why Dial In

Standard setting raises critical antitrust concerns especially in high technology industries. The rules of standard setting organizations often are critical to the nature of competition in markets that depend on standard setting. Rules on disclosure on intellectual property rights, the disclosure of those rights and the terms of licensing arrangements are often the subjects of controversy. The Federal Trade Commission has brought several cases in this area and there have been numerous private cases as well.

The most important recent guidance was a decision late last month from the DC Circuit in FTC v. Rambus, reversing the FTC's decision that Rambus violated the antitrust laws by failing to properly disclose intellectual property and then seeking royalties. The FTC litigation took several years and was seen as an important part of the FTC's enforcement efforts in the areas of standard setting and IP enforcement.

To address this important decision we have two key participants in the litigation: Douglas Melamed, partner with WilmerHale who argued the case for Rambus before the DC Circuit, and Sean Royall, partner with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and former Deputy Director of the FTC Bureau of Competition who was lead FTC counsel in the FTC Rambus trial. The panel will be moderated by former FTC Policy Director , David Balto. All three of these individuals have substantial expertise in standard setting antitrust issues.

You Will Hear About

What Attendees Have Said About Similar Programs


Thursday, May 08, 2008

11:00 am

Overview of the FTC v. Rambus Decision

David A. Balto, Esq., Moderator
Attorney at Law / Washington, DC

11:15 am

The Rambus Perspective

A. Douglas Melamed, Esq.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP / Washington, DC

11:30 am

The FTC Perspective

M. Sean Royall, Esq.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP / Dallas, TX

12:00 pm




Tuition is $125 per caller and $50 each for any additional people on the same line who desire continuing education credit.

Cancellation & Substitution

You may substitute another person at any time. If you are unable to join the call, you can download it later or we'll send you a CD of the program for an additional $10.

Continuing Education Credits

This TeleBriefing qualifies for 1.0 Washington CLE credit. Upon request, we will apply for CLE credits in other states and other types of credits.


The telephone number and link to the materials will be E-Mailed to you after we process your order. All orders are processed within one business day of receipt.

If You Cannot Attend

You may download the entire TeleBriefing for $125 or obtain a CD for $135. Both options include the written materials.
Order Homestudy

Our Distinguished Panel

David A. Balto, Moderator and attorney at law in Washington, DC, focuses on antitrust and trade regulation and intellectual property litigation and represents pharmaceutical companies on pricing, distribution, mergers and joint ventures. Previously he was Policy Director of the Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade Commission.

A. Douglas Melamed, partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, is co-chair of the firm's Antitrust and Competition Department. He served in the U.S. Department of Justice from October 1996 to January 2001, first as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General and then as Acting Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division.

M. Sean Royall, partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, specializes in antitrust and commercial litigation and co-chairs the firm's Antitrust and Trade Regulation Practice Group. He is also an active member of the firm's Appellate and Constitutional Law and Intellectual Property Practice Groups. Previously he was Deputy Director of the Bureau of Competition at the Federal Trade Commission.